Registry
Company Registry
A growing registry of major public companies, starting with the largest S&P 500 names and expanding over time without turning the data layer into soup.
10 companies shown
Currently showing 10 of 10 published companies. Sorted by freedCapitalPotential (desc)
| Company | Sector | Moat | Decentral. | Profit | P/E | Mkt cap | IPO cap | IPO x | IPO CAGR | Freed cap | Products | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft MSFTRank ≈ 3Software & Cloud Platforms Enterprise software and cloud infrastructure giant spanning productivity, developer platforms, and operating systems. | Information Technology Software & Cloud Platforms | 9.1/10 Enterprise defaults, compliance comfort, and deeply embedded workflow software make Microsoft durable. | 6.4/10 Open productivity, git hosting, and private cloud tooling are credible enough to create real replacement pressure. | 9.5/10 Microsoft monetizes distribution, enterprise trust, and cloud scale with unusual consistency. | 36.0x Approximate valuation snapshot reflecting durable growth and margin quality. | $3.3T Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | $519.0M Computed from Microsoft's $21.00 IPO price and 24,715,113 shares outstanding after the offering in the prospectus. | 6,358.2x Current market cap divided by the IPO market cap implied on 1986-03-13. | 24.5% Compound annual market cap growth from the IPO date 1986-03-13 through the snapshot date 2026-03-14. | $523.2B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses | |
Meta Platforms METARank ≈ 6Interactive Media & Services Ad-supported social and messaging empire anchored by Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. | Communication Services Interactive Media & Services | 7.9/10 Meta's social graph and ad targeting moat is strong but more culturally reversible than deep infrastructure moats. | 7.4/10 Federated social and open messaging create unusually clear alternative pathways. | 8.6/10 Meta remains deeply profitable thanks to attention capture and ad-market scale. | 28.0x Approximate valuation snapshot for a high-margin ad platform. | $1.8T Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | $81.2B Computed from Meta's $38.00 IPO price in the final prospectus and 2,138,085,037 total Class A and Class B shares outstanding after the IPO in Amendment No. 8 to the registration statement. | 22.2x Current market cap divided by the IPO market cap implied on 2012-05-18. | 25.1% Compound annual market cap growth from the IPO date 2012-05-18 through the snapshot date 2026-03-14. | $446.0B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses | |
Alphabet GOOGLRank ≈ 4Interactive Media & Services Search, ads, video, mobile, and cloud giant still centered economically on attention capture. | Communication Services Interactive Media & Services | 8.7/10 Google's search and ad ecosystem is extremely entrenched, though less physically rooted than hardware moats. | 6.8/10 Open search, federated media, and de-Googled mobile stacks create meaningful replacement paths. | 8.8/10 Alphabet still turns defaults and ad infrastructure into enormous profit streams. | 26.0x Approximate valuation snapshot for a mature ad-and-cloud platform. | $2.4T Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | $23.1B Computed from Google's $85.00 IPO price and 271,219,643 total common shares outstanding after the offering in the final prospectus. | 104.1x Current market cap divided by the IPO market cap implied on 2004-08-19. | 24.0% Compound annual market cap growth from the IPO date 2004-08-19 through the snapshot date 2026-03-14. | $444.3B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses | |
Amazon AMZNRank ≈ 5Broadline Retail Retail, logistics, advertising, and cloud juggernaut with scale in both atoms and bits. | Consumer Discretionary Broadline Retail | 8.9/10 Amazon's operational density and AWS standardization create a wide, two-headed moat. | 5.7/10 Open cloud tooling and local commerce stacks create pressure, but logistics scale remains difficult to distribute. | 7.6/10 Amazon's profit engine is improving, but it is still less pristine than the pure software aristocracy. | 36.0x Approximate valuation snapshot reflecting cloud and advertising growth expectations. | $2.2T Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | $429.5M Computed from Amazon's $18.00 IPO price and 23,858,702 shares outstanding after the offering in the final prospectus. | 5,122.8x Current market cap divided by the IPO market cap implied on 1997-05-15. | 34.5% Compound annual market cap growth from the IPO date 1997-05-15 through the snapshot date 2026-03-14. | $301.3B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses | |
Apple AAPLRank ≈ 2Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals A vertically integrated device and services empire built around the iPhone. | Information Technology Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals | 9.3/10 Apple benefits from device lock-in, brand power, and control over app and service distribution. | 2.8/10 Pieces of the stack can be replaced, but the integrated ecosystem remains unusually sticky. | 9.1/10 Apple converts ecosystem control into durable high-margin earnings. | 32.0x Approximate valuation snapshot for a mature but highly profitable platform company. | $3.7T Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | $1.2B Computed from Apple's $22.00 IPO price and 54,215,332 shares outstanding after the offering in the final prospectus. | 3,102.1x Current market cap divided by the IPO market cap implied on 1980-12-12. | 19.4% Compound annual market cap growth from the IPO date 1980-12-12 through the snapshot date 2026-03-14. | $234.3B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses | |
NVIDIA NVDARank ≈ 1Semiconductors GPU kingmaker for AI training, inference, gaming, and high-performance compute. | Information Technology Semiconductors | 9.6/10 CUDA lock-in plus premium hardware and ecosystem depth make NVIDIA unusually hard to dislodge. | 2.5/10 Alternative compute stacks exist, but cutting-edge GPU supply is still profoundly centralized. | 9.7/10 NVIDIA's profit power is elite because demand is intense and supply remains constrained. | 61.0x Approximate valuation snapshot reflecting high growth expectations and AI enthusiasm. | $4.3T Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | $332.4M Computed from NVIDIA's $12.00 IPO price and 27,703,738 shares outstanding after the offering in the final prospectus. | 12,934.5x Current market cap divided by the IPO market cap implied on 1999-01-22. | 41.7% Compound annual market cap growth from the IPO date 1999-01-22 through the snapshot date 2026-03-14. | $222.5B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses | |
Tesla TSLARank ≈ 8Automobile Manufacturers EV, charging, energy storage, and autonomy company that sells both products and future narratives. | Consumer Discretionary Automobile Manufacturers | 7.4/10 Tesla has brand and infrastructure advantages, but much of the category remains contestable. | 5.9/10 Charging and energy layers are openable, while vehicle manufacturing remains centralized. | 5.8/10 Tesla is profitable but less predictably so than the platform-heavy names above it. | 70.0x Approximate valuation snapshot reflecting very high future expectations. | $1.0T Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | $1.6B Computed from Tesla's $17.00 IPO price and 93,109,393 shares outstanding after the offering and concurrent private placement in the final prospectus. | 631.8x Current market cap divided by the IPO market cap implied on 2010-06-29. | 50.8% Compound annual market cap growth from the IPO date 2010-06-29 through the snapshot date 2026-03-14. | $190.0B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses | |
Broadcom AVGORank ≈ 7Semiconductors Semiconductor and infrastructure software consolidator with critical exposure to networking and virtualization. | Information Technology Semiconductors | 8.6/10 Broadcom combines hard-to-replicate hardware supply with entrenched enterprise software footprints. | 3.8/10 Virtualization can be displaced more readily than Broadcom's semiconductor relevance. | 8.9/10 The company has both pricing power and critical infrastructure exposure. | 50.0x Approximate valuation snapshot reflecting AI and infrastructure enthusiasm. | $1.1T Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | $3.5B Computed from Avago's $15.00 IPO price and 235,888,203 shares outstanding immediately after the offering in the final prospectus. | 310.9x Current market cap divided by the IPO market cap implied on 2009-08-06. | 41.3% Compound annual market cap growth from the IPO date 2009-08-06 through the snapshot date 2026-03-14. | $117.8B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses | |
Walmart WMTRank ≈ 10Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail Scale retail and grocery giant whose moat lives in sourcing, logistics, and physical footprint. | Consumer Staples Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail | 8.2/10 Walmart's physical scale and procurement leverage are deeply entrenched. | 4.4/10 Open marketplace tooling and local production can attack parts of the model, but not the entire logistics machine. | 6.4/10 Walmart's economics are strong because of scale, even if retail margins are not glamorous. | 38.0x Approximate valuation snapshot reflecting defensive scale and market optimism. | $800.0B Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | $21.5M Computed from Walmart's $16.50 IPO price on October 1, 1970 and the SEC News Digest note that 1,300,000 common shares would be outstanding after the offering. | 37,296.0x Current market cap divided by the IPO market cap implied on 1970-10-01. | 20.9% Compound annual market cap growth from the IPO date 1970-10-01 through the snapshot date 2026-03-14. | $97.0B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses | |
Berkshire Hathaway BRK.BRank ≈ 9Multi-Sector Holdings Conglomerate spanning insurance, rail, utilities, manufacturing, and a massive equity portfolio. | Financials Multi-Sector Holdings | 8.8/10 Insurance float, regulated assets, and operational breadth give Berkshire serious staying power. | 1.9/10 Most of Berkshire's core businesses are not software-shaped enough to decentralize quickly. | 8.1/10 Berkshire remains a high-quality allocator and owner of durable earnings streams. | 14.0x Approximate valuation snapshot for a diversified asset-heavy compounder. | $900.0B Approximate market cap snapshot from public market trackers. | — Not available. | — Not available. | — Not available. | $43.5B Derived from market cap, moat resistance, decentralizability, and profitability. It is a directional estimate of value capture that could come under pressure if open alternatives compound. | 2 product analyses |